Home › Compare › Bullhorn vs Loxo
Head-to-head · 2026Bullhorn vs Loxo: which should you buy?
| Bullhorn | Loxo | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | ★★★★☆ 4.0 | ★★★★☆ 4.2 |
| Category | Staffing & agency software | Staffing & agency software |
| Price tier | $$$ · $1,000–$5,000/mo | $$ · $100–$1,000/mo |
| Trial | Demo only | Free plan |
| Ideal team size | 10–10,000 recruiters | 1–200 recruiters |
| Sourcing database | Add-on marketplace | Built in |
| Back office | Pay-and-bill included | Not included |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Interface | Dated in places | Modern |
| Best for | Large staffing agencies | Search firms and small agencies |
Bullhorn in brief
Bullhorn is the incumbent system of record for staffing agencies, combining ATS, sales CRM, onboarding, time and billing in one platform with a large marketplace of agency-specific add-ons.
Loxo in brief
Loxo bundles an agency ATS and CRM with a 1.2-billion-profile sourcing database, contact data and outreach sequences, giving a small search firm the stack a large agency buys in four parts.
FAQ
Is Bullhorn or Loxo better?
Loxo wins for agencies under 50 recruiters on price, bundled sourcing and modern design; Bullhorn wins for large agencies needing back office and VMS integrations.
Who should choose Bullhorn over Loxo?
Bullhorn is the better choice for established staffing agencies that need ATS, CRM and back office together; Loxo is best for search firms and small agencies that want ATS, CRM and sourcing in one.
Which is cheaper, Bullhorn or Loxo?
Bullhorn is in our $$$ tier ($1,000–$5,000/mo); Loxo is in the $$ tier ($100–$1,000/mo).